The ‘Self-Help’ Mantra Gains Followers Heading Into 2024
Never mind favorable industry tailwinds or a strong economic backdrop.
Speaking to the investor conference he and his team hosted early this month, Baird & Co. analyst Matt Krueger said perhaps the biggest factor separating leadership teams with a good handle on 2024 from those struggling to chart a clear path is the ability to make their own luck.
“Companies that have a self-improvement element to their story seem much more confident than those that are relying on what appears to be a very uncertain or a wide range of macro outcomes,” Krueger said during a conversation with Monish Patolawala, president and CFO of 3M Co.
Patolawala and his team have been ahead of that curve: 3M in late January said it would lay off 2,500 manufacturing workers around the world because of weak sales in several product categories. Talking to Krueger, Patolawala recapped 3M’s priorities around a small number of principles: Trim factory output and staff to match demand, shave other structural costs in the company’s core operations, build a more agile supply chain and take the company closer to its customers.
If successful, 3M’s push stands to give it an annualized bottom-line lift of up to $900 million by the end of 2025, Patolawala said. The company’s teams, he added, “are doing a lot of self-help” to stay on track for those targets.
Matt Elliott, Michigan president for Bank of America and the lender’s lead sustainability executive (pictured), also is seeing clients focus on resiliency and efficiency amid a “substantial” amount of economic crosscurrents. The urge to trim the sails and play it safer for a while is understandable, he said, but inaction can be costly if firms lose ground to competitors. Benchmarking to other players in your market is key in figuring out opportunity costs, he said, as well as digging deeper into what’s working and what can be better.
“When you boil it down, we see a lot of opportunity with a lot of execution risk,” Elliott said. “There’s a high premium on management skill.”
Prioritizing Management Skill
One data point from a recently released study by manufacturing operations software firm Parsec Automation Corp. illustrates that need for skill: More than half of the manufacturing leaders who responded to Parsec’s survey about automation projects say artificial intelligence and machine learning should be a part of their future systems. But only one in three think their businesses are prepared to take advantage of that tech.
“When asked about the barriers standing in their way, respondents cited lack of knowledge (46%), lack of trust in the technology (39%) and implementation costs (33%),” the Parsec team wrote.
So, in addition to strengthening the core and benchmarking to peers, how else should leaders respond to this uncertain environment?
Placing small bets is one approach. During a recent IndustryWeek panel discussing the economic outlook for manufacturers, Ohio State University economic development professor Ned Hill said sticking to “existential” investments in areas such as labor and supply chains is a must.
“Companies that don’t invest are going to die,” Hill said.
Elliott said smaller manufacturers can often benefit from buying used equipment and retrofitting it to their processes, a strategy that can boost the value of their intellectual property. And Hale said a lot of organizations still run in part on manual processes that “are ripe for the picking.” Upgrading those one at a time can be a steady source of improvement, he added.
Along those lines, Hill said there’s also no magic wand when it comes to automation.
“This is a 20-year event that’s going to be taking place and the challenge to particularly the small and midsized companies is how do you do that one-off automation project but then link it so it becomes part of a digital integration strategy?” he said.
With that in mind, maybe one of the best self-help strategies heading into ’24 is to take a few deep breaths. You have some time to make the right decision.