IndustryWeek : How Metals Industry Can Prepare for Major OSHA Crackdown
Home : Economy & Public Policy : How Metals Industry Can Prepare for Major OSHA Crackdown

How Metals Industry Can Prepare for Major OSHA Crackdown

Fines double for violations, but proactive safety steps can prevent future citations.

By Joseph P. Paranac, Jr., attorney

June 20, 2011

The Occupational Safety and Health Administration is cracking down on hazards in the so-called primary metals industries. This means makers of nails, pipes, insulated wires and cables -- just about anyone involved in extracting and refining the likes of iron, lead, nickel or tin -- can count on facing at least three OSHA inspections per year.

 This extraordinary level of scrutiny comes in the wake of what OSHA has described as serious and frequent safety problems in the sector, where the list of hazards includes metal dusts and fumes, carbon monoxide, toxins like lead or silica and high levels of noise and heat.

OSHA’s National Emphasis Program for the primary metals industries will be a big change for employers. Simply put, it means they will be seeing a lot of OSHA. Even if the first inspection goes off without a hitch, employers can count on at least two follow-ups each year. And we are not talking about slaps on the wrist here: The Obama administration’s OSHA offices have been steadily ramping up penalties.

Indeed, the typical fine is now approximately double what it might have been in 2007. Employers that brazenly fail to prepare for these inspections will likely face substantial penalties. Even relatively safe shops that make a few compliance slipups could be hit with a $50,000 fine.

How should employers prepare?

The first step is to become fully acquainted with OSHA’s plans. At osha.gov, employers will find a number of tips and services geared toward helping them get ready. The next step is to do a self-assessment. Clearly, OSHA will look at whether employees are wearing respirators where required and whether those and other personal protective equipment meet the appropriate specifications. Is the respirator in question effective at reducing the specific chemicals in the air at the plant?

If the regulations for a particular activity or chemical call for protection of the hands and extremities, are employees actually wearing the right gear in the right way? Is the level of toxin exposure over the permissible exposure limit? Are the appropriate exhaust systems and fans in place?

Workers sometimes chafe at wearing respirators or other protective devices. The seriousness of this mistake should be impressed upon them: In other words, ‘wear the stuff or get another job.’ But employers must also endure their share of discomfort. As noted by OSHA, for example, many plants fail to carry out air-testing as required because they regard it as a hassle. In the current regulatory environment, this is not recommended. OSHA’s compliance officers will undoubtedly be looking closely at air quality during at least three on-site inspections. This could involve steps such as attaching air-samplers to employees’ mouths for the entirety of an eight-hour shift. Employers are well advised to get the air cleaned up before OSHA arrives.

Displaying 1 of 2
Page:<< Back · Next >>
View article on one page
Spotlight

Bridging the Leadership Skills Gap

By Bill Westwood, Korn/Ferry
First step: identify current skills and align with needs.

Read Full Story
Also on IndustryWeek.com

New White Papers

More White Papers »

Poll
Which manufacturing sector has the best chance of outperforming the U.S. economy this year?






Comment in the IW Forums.